‘Resident Evil: Apocalypse’ (2004), ‘Resident Evil: Extinction’ (2007), and ‘Resident Evil: Afterlife’ (2010) — movies
Resident Evil: Apocalypse (2004)
IMDB Synopsis: “Alice wakes up in Racoon city hospital after the city has been overrun by zombies. Alice must now make it out of the city before a mucilage bomb is dropped on the city.”
Rotten Tomatoes Score: 20%
Rotten Tomatoes Critical Consensus: “‘Resident Evil: Apocalypse’ has lots of action, but not much in terms of plot or creativity.”
Resident Evil: Extinction (2007)
IMDB Synopsis: “Survivors of the Raccoon City catastrophe travel across the Nevada desert, hoping to make it to Alaska. Alice joins the caravan and their fight against the evil Umbrella Corp.”
Rotten Tomatoes Score: 24%
Rotten Tomatoes Critical Consensus: “‘Resident Evil: Extinction’ is more of the same; its few impressive action sequences unable to compensate for the pedestrian plot.”
Resident Evil: Afterlife (2010)
IMDB Synopsis: “While still out to destroy the evil Umbrella Corporation, Alice joins a group of survivors living in a prison surrounded by the infected who also want to relocate to the mysterious but supposedly unharmed safe haven known only as Arcadia.”
Rotten Tomatoes Score: 22%
Rotten Tomatoes Critical Consensus: “As dim-witted and lifeless as its undead antagonists, ‘Resident Evil: Afterlife’ is a wholly unnecessary addition to the franchise.”
Average Rotten Tomatoes score of all three films: 22%
Let’s block ads! (Why?)